Mamanasco Lake Improvement Fund
M.L.I.F. Newsletter

Summer 2010

  

 

 

President’s Message

 

Dear Neighbors in the Watershed,

 

It is my delight and honor to serve as the new President of MLIF.  My husband and I moved to Ridgefield 8 years ago specifically because of Mamanasco Lake.  We love it here.  We swim with our children and grandchildren.  We kayak around the lake and enjoy the wonderful wildlife.  We ice skate in the winter.  I hope you also enjoy this special place to live.  If you do not have direct access to the lake, remember anyone in the watershed can join the Beach Club where you can swim and boat.  When we first moved here, we did not realize how important MLIF is to the lake.  Were it not for MLIF, the lake would quickly become a weed and algae-filled swamp.  The Diquat treatment MLIF ordered in mid May has done its job, and the weeds are dying back.  Some water left the lake right after the treatment; therefore, MLIF had that water tested, and the Diquat levels met EPA standards.  MLIF also had two engineering firms inspect the spillway.  Everything is fine. All we need now is rain to fill up the lake again!  So while the MLIF Board works hard to care for the lake, we hope all of you will help us.  You can do your part by making a contribution to help pay for the weed and algae treatments.  MLIF mailed fundraising letters to watershed residents on June 2nd. You can take care of your septic systems and limit the amount of fertilizer you use to reduce the amount of nutrients going into the lake that feed the weeds and algae.  You can ensure that nothing but water enters the lake.  Mamanasco Lake depends on all of us.  Enjoy the lake and help us care for it.

 

Barb Hartman, President

 

 

MLIF Mission

Watershed volunteers organized MLIF in 1971 to preserve and beautify Lake Mamanasco, Ridgefield’s largest body of water.  MLIF is a non-profit community organization comprised of volunteers commited to carrying out this mission and educating residents in the MLIF watershed. MLIF does not own property, have fixed assets, nor paid employees. 

 

The Mamanasco Watershed encompasses 537 acres and 440 homes. 

 

Please visit our website at www.mlif.org for additional information and storied history of the Mamanasco Watershed. 

 

If you are interested in helping to care for Mamanasco Lake or enjoy learning about lake ecology, come to one of our meetings, the first Thursday of each month, 8pm, at the CVS Community Room.

 

 

 

Water Quality Report

The annual battle against the weeds in Lake Mamanasco has begun!  On May 11, 2010 MLIF did the first chemical treatment of the year using Diquat (the same chemical that did so well last year.)  Diquat is a chemical herbicide that is used to kill unwanted weeds in bodies of water.  This has killed the Curley Leaf Pondweed that effects us each May and June, and the residual invasive Eurasian Milfoil that is our biggest problem.  They will die on contact with the Diquat, turn brown and sink to the bottom. 

 

After drawing down the Lake 10 1/2 inches, Diquat was applied by Lycott Environmental Company.  The lake is now safe to swim in and can be used for watering lawns and gardens.  This is the same protocol that we used successfully last year. We will be watching for the growth of algae (which occurs each year) and will treat that with Alum as necessary.  Alum binds with the phosphorus in the water column and thereby removes one of the main nutrients that helps algae grow.  We, at MLIF, expect that our lake will again be clear this year and that Mamanasco Lake will continue to be the crown jewel of Ridgefield

 

Once again we want to thank all of you that have helped us with generous donations; without all your help this goal would never be achieved.  If you have any questions or comments, I can be reached at ala.mar29@yahoo.com or at 438-3478.

 

Alan Marcus, MLIF Water Quality Chair

 

 

                                                                               * * * * * * * * 

 

Mamanasco Lake History

 

What does Port of Missing Men or Eight Lakes have to do with Mamanasco Lake?

 

Mamanasco Lake has a storied history with several characters. It has existed since the retreat of glaciers from Fairfield. Jack Sanders has written several articles on the history of Mamanasco and the Port of Missing Men, included in the www.mlif.org website. In addition, The Discovery Center at Ridgefield recently offered a Port of Missing Men Hike and Historical Program. 

 

Arrowheads and spearheads found along the lake are clues that Native Americans used the area for hunting game, water fowl and fish. In 1707, Native Americans sold the area to settlers. The name Mamanasquag appeared on the deed. Settlers recognized the Mamanasco basin would be an excellent water source for a gristmill and built the first one in 1717. 

 

In 1908, famed New York Lawyer Henry B. Anderson purchased 1,750 acres in Ridgefield and New York, hoping to develop the land for wealthy New Yorkers. Without enough interest, he built a hunting, fishing and dining resort instead on Titicus Mountain called “The Port of Missing Men,” named after a 1907 best selling novel written by Meredith Nicholson. During the prohibition era, it was renamed to Anderson’s Tea House and operated until the 1930’s. 

 

In 1946 the Tea House was demolished. Further explained by Jack Sanders, “In the early 1950s, a group of New Yorkers bought much of the property and subdivided the Ridgefield portions into the Eight Lakes development. Hundreds of house lots were created. Some 10 miles of Port of Missing Men trails and paths, many of them created by early Italian immigrants working for Henry Anderson, became subdivision roads and new ones were added. The roads include Walnut Hill Road, Birch Court, Rock Road, Scott Ridge Road, Blue Ridge Road, Caudatowa Drive, Sleepy Hollow Road, Round Lake Road, First through 12th Lanes, part of Mamanasco Road, and the western portions of both Barrack Hill and Old Sib Roads.” Eight Lakes is named for the eight bodies of water that encompassed the Anderson property in Ridgefield and New York: Mamanasco Lake, Turtle Pond, Round Pond, Lake Roppowan, Lake Oscaleta, Lake Waccabuc and two small man-made ponds in southern North Salem

 

Now the stewardship of Mamanasco Lake belongs to each resident in the watershed. Let our actions contribute to the health of Ridgefield’s largest lake today and add a positive chapter to the history of Mamanasco Lake!

 

 

* * * * * * * * 

Egg Addling

With permission of CT DEP, MLIF conducts goose egg addling to reduce resident geese population. This season, 27 goose eggs were addled, thereby decreasing the amount phosphorous and nitrogen going into the lake.

 * * * * * * * * 

 

If you have questions or comments

about Lake Mamanasco or the MLIF,

you can email them to MLIFboard@yahoo.com 

* * * * * * * *

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Protecting Lake Mamanasco

Since completion of the Lake Mamanasco Watershed study in 1991, the MLIF, in conjunction with and support by both the Town of Ridgefield and the Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection, has initiated the installation of stormwater BMPs and education programs to improve and protect the lake’s water quality. The study points out that the chemical treatments that are currently being used to control weed and algae growth are not a long term solution to that problem.

 

As part of the MLIF planning and educational initiative, in addition to our  watershed management plan, Land-Tech Consultants has prepared, at our request, a Lake Protection Zone document (see below) providing a series of guidelines for the management of lakeside and wetland vegetative filter strips and stormwater runoff management.  Operation and Maintenance Guidance for Low Impact Development Best Management Practices (see below) has also been prepared for use by both residents and the Town’s Highway department. This guidance explains the maintenance requirements of stormwater BMPs already installed to reduce sediment and nutrient loading to the lake, or on private residentially developed land within the watershed.

 

The recent changes to the Inland Wetlands regulations are consistent with the efforts undertaken by the MLIF to adopt flexible guidelines to: 1) direct soil disturbance activities within the Mamanasco Lake watershed, 2) enhance the treatment capacity of vegetative buffers and other Best Management Practices to treat stormwater runoff and other nonpoint sources of pollution, and 3) improve lake water quality, while still permitting reasonable use of property. 

 

We believe that the guidelines in the Lake Protection Zone ordinance are consistent with the new regulations.  

 

 

 

Mamanasco Lake Protection Zone 

 

 

Introduction:

 

In order to reduce the amount of pollution entering Lake Mamanasco by means of storm water runoff, a "Lake Protection Zone" has been delineated within the lake's watershed. The zone will has two regions. Region #1 comprises the shoreline and a shoreline buffer, which  constitutes the area from the shoreline to a distance 100' upland from the lake margin. Region #2 comprises all of the remaining area within the watershed beyond the 100' point.

 

As is currently the case with the four rivers in Town, the Ridgefield Inlands Wetlands Board has amended the Inland-Wetlands regulations by increasing the Upland Review area around Mamanasco Lake to 100 feet and by adopting a set of guidelines that are recommended for the use throughout the entire watershed.  Any regulated activity that takes place within 100' of the lake shoreline will require a permit from the Inlands Wetlands Board.  The guidelines may, at the discretion of the Inland Wetlands Board or its designated agents, be required as condidtions to obtain a permit for a regulated activity not only within the 100' review area but within the entire watershed.  The guidelines are presented below in detail.  They are consistent with the ongoing efforts of MLIF to protect the health of the lake.  Lake systems such as Mamanasco are equally susceptible to land use impacts and are worthy of the same protection as the rivers.

 

Since Region #1 is more densely developed it is the most critical in terms of the impact on the water quality. With the 25’ extended upland review area, all of the land use in Region #1 will be regulated under Section 4.5 of the Town's Inland Wetland and Watercourses regulations. The the guidelines are defined in this document under Lake Protection Guidelines – Region #1. (Note: The use of guidelines has proven to be effective in other towns and, with proper oversight, will be effective in the Town of Ridgefield as well.)

 

Under the proposed changes, land in Region #2 that is within 100’ of a watercourse will also be subject to Inland Wetland regulations. The guidelines are defined in this document under Lake Protection Guidelines – Region #2. 

 

Background and Rational:

Lake Mamanasco has undergone advanced cultural eutrophication, due primarily to stormwater and groundwater inputs from the 537-acre watershed.  A study conducted by Baystate Environmental in 1991, stated the primary source of phosphorus identified was the storm drainage system (50% of the total), with both groundwater (24%) and surface tributaries (16%) contributing substantial amounts of this limiting nutrient to the lake. 

 

A 50% reduction in phosphorus loading from the contributing watershed was recommended in the Baystate findings to improve lake water quality.  In 1996 the Mamanasco Lake Improvement Fund (MLIF) adopted this goal and in association with the Town of Ridgefield and the Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection (CT DEP) implemented a plan to reduce the introduction of sediment and phosphorus by the installation of Best Management Practices (BMPs) on a prioritized basis within the lake’s watershed. 

 

Land-Tech Consultants was retained to develop a watershed management plan for Lake Mamanasco.  The objectives of this project were to assess current watershed conditions, identify nonpoint source pollutants, and the design and development of a stormwater and sediment management plan for the drainage area on the western side of the lake. 

 

A final report entitled Watershed Management Plan for Mamanasco Lake Phase I Report December 29, 1997 identified a prioritized grid system approach to reduce sediment loads and associated phosphorus contributions to the lake. The Mamanasco Lake Improvement Fund adopted the recommendations and Land-Tech Consultants were contracted to begin design of the control measures. Design and construction of Best Management Practices (BMP’s) to reduce nutrient loading from stormwater runoff and sedimentation began in 1998 and 2001, respectively with Grid #1 at Second Lane. Following recommendations from the Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection (CTDEP) design and construction of BMP’s are completed within lower (i.e., Mamanasco Road) and then the upper reaches of individual subsheds (drainage areas) of each grid. The Mamanasco Lake Improvement Fund with grants from the Town of Ridgefield and the CTDEP, Clean Lakes Program, provide funding for design and construction. The Town of Ridgefield Engineering Department contracts for and oversees construction of the drainage improvements. Maintenance of the BMP’s is provided by the Town’s Highway Department.

 

The MLIF recognizes that continued reduction of diffuse nonpoint water contamination requires a watershed-based approach, and that the majority of water quality problems result from nonpoint sources are associated with urbanization of the watershed among other sources. The introduction of pollutants (sediment, nutrients, pesticides, etc.) varies spatially and temporally, making quantification and control difficult.

 

The National Water-Quality Assessment (NAWQA) initiated in 1991 by the U.S. Geological Survey, confirmed that water-quality conditions and aquatic health are reflective of a complex interaction of land-use and management and natural resources (i.e., soils, geology, hydrology and climate). The EPA Storm Water Phase II Rule originates from the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) and applies to communities like Ridgefield, which has adopted a Phase II storm water management plan; also recognizes the importance of controlling non-point source pollution from stormwater runoff. The state of Connecticut also recognizes the importance of managing the introduction nonpoint source pollutants into wetlands and watercourses by the adoption of Inland wetlands and watercourses regulations and 2002 Connecticut Guidelines for Soil Erosion and Sediment Control. The Town of Ridgefield implements both regulatory programs.

 

Recognizing the importance of protecting the lake’s water quality and the results of the Baystate D/F report findings, MLIF proposed adoption of a Lake Protection Zone to further reduce pollutant loading of the lake and expand the introduction of BMPs on both developed and undeveloped parcels as well as within publicly held land.

 

Goals and Objectives:

The following goals and objectives are included in the Lake Protection Zone:

 

Goals:

  1. The control and reduction of sediment and associated nutrients (phosphorus) from watershed runoff;
  2. Maximize, to the extend possible, the infiltration of runoff associated with urbanization of the watershed;
  3. Complement existing land use regulations, while permitting the reasonable use of developed and undeveloped land within the Lake’s watershed, and;
  4. Education of the populous living within the watershed and those who use the lake to the impacts associated with land-development and land use.

Objectives.

  1. Establishment of management zones around the lake with specific guidelines to help direct land development and use;
  2. Introduction of vegetative and structural BMPs to control and treat stormwater runoff on both developed and undeveloped watershed land;
  3. Use of the most current BMP’s to remove, to the maximum extent possible, nonpoint source pollutants when upgrading municipal stormwater management systems or public rights of way;
  4. Control and treat the peak rate of post-development stormwater runoff for a two –year storm to pre-development rates;
  5. Establish a twice per year (fall and spring) cleaning requirement of municipally owned, operated and controlled stormwater management systems, and;
  6. An annual inspection of the watershed by the MLIF in association with the Town of Ridgefield to identify existing or new sources of nonpoint pollution and take measures to control them.

 

PROPOSED GUIDELINES

for the

PROTECTION OF MAMANASCO LAKE

 

Regions of Lake Watershed Protection:

 

Region #1 - Shoreline and Shoreline Protection Area, which includes the lake surface to a point 100.0 ft landward, and;

Region #2 - The remainder of the watershed beyond Region #1

 

Land Development Criteria- Existing and Undeveloped Land

The following guidelines for lake water quality protection are developed from a review of the literature and land use practices employed by other communities.  They include both Regions #1 and #2. Land use guidelines for each area are presented below.  

 

 

LAKE PROTECTION GUIDELINES – Region #1

Shoreline and Shoreline Protection Area

 

Region #1 is the most critical and most developed; therefore, having the greatest potential to impact on lake water quality. The primary objectives within this area on both developed and undeveloped parcels are the creation of a vegetative littoral zone (0 - 3 feet in depth) and upland buffer to filter surface runoff before it enters the lake.  See Figures No. 2 & 3 for a typical site plan examples. To achieve this, the following is proposed.

 

1.      A dock (floating or fixed) and beach area is permitted. The beach area should not exceed 25% of the parcel’s lake frontage.

2.      On undeveloped parcels, a 10.6-meter (35 ft.) wide minimum vegetative buffer component consisting of 50% coarse grasses, wildflowers or other acceptable herbaceous growth and 50% shrubs and trees is proposed.

3.      If a clearing is made for lake access through a vegetative buffer, a path 4-6’ in width made at an angle through the vegetative buffer would decrease the likelihood of runoff. The surface of the path should be porous (i.e., wood chips, stone dust, gravel or other acceptable pervious non-polluting material).

4.      On any existing developed parcel the same 10.6-meter wide buffer is recommended.  When site restrictions preclude this from being achieved, a 4.5-meter (15 ft.) wide minimum upland vegetative buffer component consisting of 50% coarse grasses, wildflowers or other acceptable herbaceous growth and 50% shrubs and trees is recommended.

5.      On existing developed parcels where site conditions preclude the creation of a 4.5-meter wide vegetative upland buffer, one-third or five (5) feet of the buffer may consist of aquatic emergents planted in the shallow littoral (normal high water mark to a 3 foot depth) of the lake.

6.      Clearing of vegetation for a view corridor should be limited to 25% of a parcel’s shoreline length. It is recommended that clear cutting of vegetation on individual lots be limited to a maximum of 25% of the lot area.

7.      Vertical clearing of vegetation should be limited to one-third the height of the tree canopy.

8.      It is recommended that walkways, docks, beaches and boathouse be developed in the view corridor.

9.      It is recommended that landowners employ current Best Management Practices (see attached BMPs) to control sediment and erosion  consistent with the Connecticut guidelines

10.  Control post-development peak rate of stormwater runoff to predevelopment rates for a 2-year storm. Infiltration is the preferred method for control, but other methods may be acceptable. No direct discharges of stormwater runoff to the lake are permitted without pre-treatment to remove 80% of the total suspended solids (TSS) contained in the runoff.

 

LAKE PROTECTION GUIDELINES – Region #2

1.      It is recommended that clear cutting of vegetation on individual lots be limited to a maximum of 25% of the lot area.

2.      It is recommended that clearing of natural vegetation (native species of trees shrubs and herbaceous plants) on individual lots be limited to a maximum of 75% of the lot area. Use of native plant species for landscaping is encouraged.

3.      It is recommended that impervious coverage be kept to a maximum of 8%. Impervious area (i.e., roof, drives, concrete patios) in excess of 8% of the lot area should where practical, be controlled to predevelopment rates for a 2-year storm.  Infiltration is the preferred method for control, but other methods may be acceptable. No direct discharges of stormwater runoff to stormwater systems are permitted without pre-treatment to remove 80% of the TSS. 

4.      An 8-meter (26 ft) wide minimum upland vegetative buffer component consisting of 50% coarse grasses, wildflowers or other acceptable herbaceous growth and 50% shrubs and trees should be provided adjacent to all wetlands and watercourses. Site conditions (e.g., steep slopes) may warrant greater vegetative buffer widths.

 

Additional Recommendations for Entire Watershed – Guidelines

 

Improvements to infrastructure like roadways and drainage systems

  • Employ current BMP’s for upgrading storm water systems consistent with the Connecticut guidelines.
  • Cleaning of catch basins, large particle separators, plunge pools, etc., once per year in Region #2 and twice per year (fall and spring) within Region #1.

Turf Grass Management

  • Testing of topsoil from at least 40% of developed parcels every three to five years to make homeowners aware if excessive fertilization is occurring. The goal is a more judicious use of fertilizer to reduce the amount of nitrogen and phosphorous entering the lake.

Note: Soil samples to be collected from higher priority areas first and sampling staggered, annually from Region #1 then to Region #2. Connecticut Agricultural Station will analyze samples free of charge. 

Septic System Maintenance

  • It is recommended that septic tanks be cleaned by a licensed septic cleaner every three to five years.
  • File report with health department to renew discharge permit.  

Riparian Buffers

·         Develop five (5) meter wide (16.4 feet) riparian buffer at a minimum wherever possible.

 

Entire Watershed

1.                  Subdivisions of two or more lots should comply with current Subdivision regulations for pre and post development peak rates of runoff.

2.                  On-site sewage disposal systems should comply with current State and Town of Ridgefield Health codes.  In situations where existing site limitations preclude meeting the current standards, every effort should be made to comply, including the use of innovative and alternative sewage disposal methodologies approved by the State of Connecticut, Department of Health and Addiction Services.

3.                  Erosion and sediment control plans should be prepared in accordance with current State Guidelines for all land alteration activities regardless of the area of disturbance.

 

Implementation

The Town of Ridgefield Inland Wetlands and Watercourse Agency regulates land use activities within the Town’s inland wetlands and watercourses and the upland review area associated with these resources under Section 4.5 of their regulations. Current Inland wetland regulations provide additional protection of named waterways within the community. Lake systems such as Mamanasco Lake are equally susceptible to land use impacts and are worthy of additional protection. Thus, implementation of these Guidelines is proposed through the Town of Ridgefield Inland Wetlands and Watercourses agency as part of the existing permitting process.

 

* * * * * * *

 

Operation and Maintenance Guidance for Low Impact Development Best Management Practices (BMPs)

 

The following guidance is provided for the operation and maintenance of the Low Impact Development (LID) stormwater Best Management Practices (BMPs).  The guidance is intended for the use of both the residential homeowner and the staff of the municipal department responsible for the maintenance of structures within the public rights of way.

 

This guidance may change from time to time as LID source treatment practices change and operational experience with the systems develops.  This document should then be revised to reflect any changes to these practices.

 

Biofiltration

 

1. “Rain Garden” - Bioretention System

Source treatment of stormwater runoff is accomplished around residential structures by means of infiltration using existing and amended soils.  Plantings of native vegetation within the biofiltration systems maintain the infiltrative capacity of the system, provide soil stabilization, and the attenuation of nutrients and potential nonpoint source pollutants.

Management actions include the following:

  1. Annual inspection and repair of or replacement of treatment components.
  2. Twice per year (spring and fall) inspection of trees and shrubs to evaluate health, removal and replacement of dead or dying plants, pruning of the diseased or broken plants.
  3. Treatment of diseased vegetation with appropriate low-toxicity chemicals (herbicides, pesticides)
  4. Weed annually and prune shrub vegetation until vegetation is established to improve appearance. Generally two to three years (growing seasons).
  5. Replace mulch to cover exposed soil area with removal and replacement of mulch every two to three years. Mulch depth not to exceed three (3) inches.  Use single pass large much.  
  6. Sample soil for fertility every three years.  Addition of limestone one or two times per year to maintain proper pH is recommended.  Field or laboratory testing for pH is acceptable.

 

2a. Grassed Lined Swales

Grassed lined swales provide transmission of post-development runoff as well as filtration and infiltration of stormwater runoff.  The turf environment also removes nutrients and other pollutants from runoff via physical filtration and nutrient attenuation prior to discharge.

Management actions include the following measures:

  1. Cut grass weekly or as needed to a height of 2.5-3 inches.  Leave clippings in place to provide fertilizer for new growth.
  2. Reseed swale with appropriate grass seed mixture and application rates as needed to insure that no bare spots develop.
  3. Sample soil for fertility every three years. Addition of limestone one or two times per year to maintain proper pH is recommended. Field or laboratory testing for pH is acceptable.
  4. Inspect turf grass for insect and weed infestation and evidence of disease and apply appropriate Integrated Pest Management (IPM) control measures for control.
  5. Inspect swale regularly for evidence of rill development.  Pack rills with sandy till, compact and apply 4-6” of settled top soil, reseed with turf mix, mulch and water as needed until grass is established (70% coverage)

 

2b. Grassed Lined Swale /Infiltration Level Spreader

The grassed lined swale/infiltration level spreader is designed to accept pre-treated runoff from impervious surfaces associated with development.  Runoff is infiltrated into the ground with excess flows discharged via overland sheet flow.  The turf environment also removes nutrients and other pollutants from runoff via physical filtration and nutrient attenuation prior to discharge.

Management actions include the following measures:

  1. Inspect the surface of the trench surface regularly (monthly) to insure surface is free of debris and the discharge is flowing via sheet flow and not concentrated.
  2. Inspect the discharge lip area for low points and down gradient flow areas for active scour or soil erosion.  Repair scour and rills with compacted sandy till, reseed, if turf grass and mulch.
  3. Inspect turf area down gradient of swale regularly for evidence of rill development.  Pack rills with sandy till, compact and apply 4-6” of settled top soil, reseed with turf mix, mulch and water, as needed, until grass is established (70% coverage).  If forest litter, re-apply four (4) inches of composted leaf mold and apply erosion control blanket (netting) in accordance with manufactures directions as needed to prevent scouring.
  4. Cut grass weekly or as needed to a height of 2.5-3 inches.  Leave clippings in place to provide fertilizer for new growth.
  5. Inspect swale twice per year (early spring and late fall), evaluate sediment depth and or accumulation of organic debris (leaves, etc).  Removed leaves to prevent matting of grass and dispose of properly. Remove accumulated sediment by hand, when depth of sediment is greater then 4” (1/3 depth of swale).  Dispose of sediment off site in approved upland area.
  6. Reseed swale with appropriate grass seed mixture and application rates, as needed, to insure that no bare spots develop.
  7. Sample soil for fertility every three years. Addition of limestone one or two times per year to maintain proper pH is recommended.  Field or laboratory testing for pH is acceptable. Apply organic slow release fertilizer based on results of fertility tests.
  8. Inspect turf grass for insect and weed infestation and evidence of disease and apply appropriate Integrated Pest Management (IPM) control measures for control, as needed.

 

3. Stormwater Wetland

The treatment wetland is designed to accept stormwater runoff from impervious surfaces.  The system is created with an inlet forebay (3 - 4 feet deep) and shallow (6-18” deep) outlet pool to trap sediment and provide habitat for aquatic organisms.  A shallow pond and wet meadow environment in the floor of the wetland is intended to provide biological and physical filtration of runoff prior to discharge.  Some runoff storage capacity for flood flows is also provided in the system by means of a control outlet structure.  The basin is planted with sedges, rushes and grasses as well as woody shrubs to provide soil stabilization, filtration and wildlife habitat.

Management actions include the following measures:

1.      Annual inspection of the forebay and inlet/outlet structure and removal of accumulated sediment when sediment depth in the forebay reaches 50% (1.5 – 2.0 feet) of the depth of the forebay.  Frequency of cleaning varies from 3-7 years depending on loading rate.

2.      Replacement of any diseased or dead vegetation within the basin with native species, as per the approved plan and by the EPB;

3.      Removal of any invasive plants, as identified by the current listing of Invasive Species compiled by the State Arboretum.  These shall include, but not be limited to, purple loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria), common reed (Phragmites australis), multiflora rose (Rosa multiflora).).  Removal shall be by hand, shovel or pulling, treatment of cut stump within 20 minutes of cutting or spraying of foliage with a 1-2% solution of Rodeoä;

4.      Inspection of the outlet pool and outlet structure and removal of sediment when sediment depth reaches 50% of the depth of the pool;

5.      Inspection and clearing of debris from the basin floor, inlet and outlet structures every six-months;

6.      Inspection of the basin to insure sheet and baseline stream flow through the wetland;

7.      Repairs to any obvious soil erosion of the sidewalls or floor of the basin, and;

8.      Repairs to the inlet and outlet structures, as needed.

 

 

4. Infiltration Level Spreader

The infiltration level spreader is designed to accept pre-treated runoff from impervious surfaces associated with dwelling development.  Runoff is infiltrated into the ground and flows via overland sheet flow toward the pond

Management actions include the following measures:

  1. Inspect the surface of the trench surface regularly (monthly) to insure surface is free of debris and the discharge is flowing via sheet flow and not concentrated.
  2. Inspect the discharge lip area for low points and down gradient flow areas for active scour or soil erosion.  Repair scour and rills with compacted sandy till, reseed, if turf grass and mulch. If forest litter, re-apply four (4) inches of composted leaf mold and apply erosion control blanket (netting) in accordance with manufactures directions as needed to prevent scouring.

 

5. Stone Trench Drains

Trench drains are provided at the rear of residential dwellings to collect surface flows and roof runoff and infiltrate the runoff into the surrounding soil matrix.  Excess runoff not infiltrated into the soil is transferred to the stormwater collection system for pre-treatment prior to discharge.

Management actions include the following measures:

  1. Inspect the surface of the trench surface regularly (monthly) to insure surface is free of debris and accepting surface runoff.
  2. Areas of ponded water over the stone inlets indicate blockage in the stone or collection pipe. Excavate stone and expose collection pipe to determine reason for blockage. Snake pipe or replace stone as needed.
  3. Check points of discharge into the stormwater piping system to insure free flow of discharge from collection pipe.  Clean or repair as required to re-establish proper flow.

6. Vegetative Filter Strip

The vegetative filter strip is designed to accept stormwater runoff from the grass lined level spreader, roof runoff and sheet flow.  The system is created to restore historically impacted riparian/wetland environments, trap sediment, infiltrate runoff, provide wildlife habitat and provide a natural floral transition from upland to wetland.  The system is planted with herbaceous plants and shrubs to provide for long-term soil stabilization, seasonal nutrient uptake by plants and maintain the soil’s infiltration capacity.

Management actions include the following measures:

1.      For the first three growing seasons inspect the system twice per year (late spring and early fall).  Replace any diseased or dead vegetation within the system with native species, as per the approved plan and by the Municipal Inland wetland and watercourses agency;

2.      Long-term, removal any invasive plants, as identified by the current listing of Invasive Species compiled by the State Arboretum.  These shall include, but not be limited to, purple loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria), common reed (Phragmites australis), multiflora rose (Rosa multiflora).).  Removal shall be by hand, shovel or pulling, treatment of cut stump within 20 minutes of cutting or spraying of foliage with a 1-2% solution of Rodeoä;

3.      Repair any obvious soil erosion (i.e., rills, gullies) Pack rills with sandy till, compact and apply 4-6” of settled top soil, reseed with turf mix, mulch and water, as needed, until grass is established (70% coverage).  If forest litter, re-apply four (4) inches of composted leaf mold and apply erosion control blanket (netting) in accordance with manufactures directions as needed to prevent scouring.

4.      Only organic slow release fertilizers shall be applied based on the results of soil fertility tests.

 

Stormwater Structures

1. Catch Basins with Deep Sumps and Hooded Outlet

Catch basins with four (4) foot deep sumps and outlet baffles are intended to collect stormwater runoff from the driveways, streets, parking areas and provide partial sediment removal and collection of floatables with discharge of flows to treatment other BMPs before discharging.

Management actions include the following measures:

1.      Inspect basins twice per year and remove accumulated sediment and debris from the basin with a vacuum truck.  Clean basin when sediment levels reach 24 inches in depth within the sumps.

2.      Inspect the outlet baffles (snouts) to insure proper attachment to wall of basin, repair as need in conformance with manufactures installation instructions.

3.      Check inlet and outlet pipes for blockages and clean and repair, as needed.

4.      Clean inlet grates of leaves each fall to permit proper flow into basins and minimize the amount of leaf litter entering the system.

 

2. Large Particle Separators (hydrodynamic separator)

Large particle separators (LPSs) are provided to remove suspended sediment, floatable debris and other solids and adsorbed pollutants from the stormwater stream draining from travel surfaces (roads, drives, parking areas).

Management actions include the following measures:

  1. Inspect structures quarterly for the first three years of operation initially to determine the accumulation rate of sediment and debris within the structures.
  2. Based on accretion rates, establish an inspection and cleaning schedule for the LPSs.
  3. Maintain the structures in accordance with the manufactures guidelines.

3. Drop-Inlet Structures

Drop-inlet structures are intended to create shallow pools to pond water, entrap water borne sediment, reduce the erosion of stream beds and banks, and provide a stable transition in stream elevations.  The structure incorporates the use of both structural (stone) and biotechnical (engineering fabric, vegetation) soil stabilization measures.

 

Management actions include the following actions:

 

  1. Inspect pools behind the stone drop structure twice per year for the first three years of operation initially to determine the accumulation rate of sediment and debris within the structures. Based on accretion rates, establish an inspection and cleaning schedule for the pools.  
  2. Remove accumulated sediment and debris with a vacuum truck or with hand labor.  Clean basin when sediment levels reach 50% of the pool depth.
  3. Inspect the outlet structure during cleaning for breaches and damage, and repair as needed to maintain flow in the center of the structure.
  4. Inspect the stream bed down gradient of the structure for evidence of scour, and re-armor as needed to prevent further scouring.
  5.  Inspect the vegetation along the banks and re-seed or replace dead and diseased to prevent soil erosion and long-term stability.

 

Disposal of Sediment and Debris

Disposal of debris and sediment removed from any of the structures must be in accordance with all applicable local, state and federal regulations.  On-site disposal of sediment and debris is not recommended.

END

  

 

  

 

 

 

Return to Home