Mamanasco Lake Improvement Fund
M.L.I.F. Newsletter

                                                                                                         

                    

 5/08

2008 Mamanasco Lake Management

On Sunday, May 4th, we began the required drawdown of Lake Mamanasco in order to begin the treatment to control the weed infestations that occur every spring.  Thanks to the cooperation of the Connecticut DEP and the NYC Water Dept., we were able to begin the Diquat treatment of the lake about three weeks earlier than we were allowed to last year.  This is in the hope that the lake will be better able to fill to its normal level in time for the summer season.

  The lake was treated by Lycott Environmental, Inc. (our consultants) on May 9th.  They added the chemical Diquat, which is the same chemical that we used last year with such great results.  Although we again anticipate no problems with the addition of Diquat, MLIF will test and monitor the wells and water quality all season. 

As you probably noticed, the lake was beautiful and weed-free last year.  We are working towards achieving the same result for this year's summer and fall seasons.  We need everybody's help to accomplish this. 

Your donations to MLIF have made this possible.  We spent $8,500 for the Diquat treatment, and the two algaecide treatments that we anticipate needing will cost $4,100 each.  Without your help, this would be impossible; with all of us working together, we can get wonderful results.

 

Lake Mamanasco Planting Exhibit

When people go to the Lake Mamanasco Beach Club, they will be able to view the new buffer garden along the shore of the beach.  They will be greeted by flowering white turtlehead with snapdragon-like blooms and joe-pye weed with purple flowers that attract butterflies.  In late summer, they'll be greeted with flowering spikes of blue lobelia.  All of these and more native species have been planted along the shoreline of the beach in a 110' long x 15' wide buffer exhibit to encourage watershed residents to plant similar buffers along the lakefront and watercourses of the watershed.

 

Gardens such as this are designed to protect lakes from harmful runoff as they absorb stormwater runoff and, in the process, catch pollutants and chemicals, including phosphorus and nitrogen that are major components of lawn fertilizers.  The fertilizers, once in the lake, feed weeds and algae.

 

Ilsa Svendsen and Joseph Keller, landscape designers from The Garden of Ideas on North Salem Road, created the garden.  They donated their design work, cleared out the invasive species at the site, and replaced them with native species.  The invasive species that were removed will keep trying to re-establish themselves until a thriving mat of the new native grasses and shrubs take hold.  If cared for correctly, the site will require minimum work after two years' time.  The Garden of Ideas will take monthly photos of the garden and post them on their website so people can appreciate its evolution.  Their website is www.gardenofideas.com.

 

A $1,000 grant from the Albert W. and Helen C. Meserve Memorial Fund, matched by $1,000 from the MLIF, made it possible to build the model buffer garden and to print the eductional pamphlets and signs for the site.

 

 

 

* * * * *

 

 

Summer 2007

PRESIDENT'S MESSAGE

MLIF is celebrating its 36th year as a non-profit organization whose mission is to take care of Mamanasco Lake.  We own no property, have no fixed assets and no paid employees.  We only ask your cooperation and your yearly contribution to keep our lake usable and enjoyable. 

 

As I write this column, our lake looks beautiful thanks to the extensive work of MLIF Board member Al Marcus.  Al spent significant time last fall and winter and more time this spring arranging for a new, more effective and less expensive treatment for our lake.  Please read his article below.

 

In this season of lawn manicuring. we remind you not to use fertilizer on your lawn or, if you feel you must, use one with no phosphorus, a chemical that leads to excessive plant and algae growth in the lake.

 

After many years of work by MLIF’s Tony Yonda, the Inland-Wetlands Board earlier this year passed an amendment to their Watercourses Regulations to include Mamanasco Lake as an Upland Review Area.  See the article on the reverse about the guidelines.  We will be informing you more about these guidelines designed to protect the lake in future newsletters.  It was great to have so many of you attend the public hearing on this amendment and speak about the need to protect the lake.

 

We recently met with town officials to continue work on our Stormwater Drainage Project.  The town has agreed that work on several aspects of our project will begin this summer.  The work includes the clean-out of existing structures, as well as installation of additional catch basins.  These basins catch sediment and harmful nutrients before running into the lake, thereby helping to control plant and algae growth as well as infill. 

 

Volunteers are what make MLIF run.  If you are interested in helping to care for our lake or enjoy learning about lake ecology, come to one of our meetings, the first Thursday of each month, 8 p.m. at the CVS Community Room.

                                                                           Kitty Fischer, President

 

Water Quality Report:

We are very pleased to be able to tell you that we have received permission from the CT Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) (and many other organizations) to use a different chemical in the lake to treat the weeds that plague us every year. We had a single application of Diquat done on May 30 and anyone who takes a look at our lake can see how effective it has been and how great the lake looks. 

We had been trying to get a permit to use Diquat for a few years; and it has taken many phone calls and many letters from MLIF and Lycott Environmental (the licensed outfit that we hire to do the applications) to get the CT DEP and the New York City Water Department to come on board and let us use this different chemical. Since the overflow from Lake Mamanasco eventually (more than five miles later) flows into the Titicus Reservoir, New York City was also involved. Diquat is not a new chemical and has been in use in the U.S. for more than thirty years.

 

Even though we weren’t required to do so, MLIF has committed to test the wells near the lake and the water flowing into the reservoir to make sure there are no problems. A test water sample taken one week after the application and directly from the lake showed that Diquat was “Non Detectable” in the water. This is one of the beauties of Diquat.  It works very quickly and is bound up and inactive in a very short period of time. Our protocol has us testing the water periodically and, although it appears to be impossible to have anything other than “non detectable” results because of the speed at which Diquat becomes inactive, we will remain faithful to our commitment.

 

The Diquat treatment cost MLIF $7,500, the well water testing will be about $3,000.  We treated the entire lake for algae on     June 20 at a cost of $4,000 and will probably need another $4,000 algae treatment later this summer. This is just to give you a brief idea as to how your donations to MLIF are used. We thank you for your past help and hope that all of you will continue to help us keep Lake Mamanasco looking as beautiful as possible, and a wonderful place for all the boaters, swimmers and fishing folk to enjoy. Without your help, this would be impossible.  With all of us working together, we can get these wonderful results.

 

If you have any questions or comments, I can be reached at 438-3478 or  alamar_29@yahoo.com

 

Alan Marcus, Director

Lake Management

  

Amendment to Inland-Wetlands Regulations for the Lake Mamanasco Watershed

 

Following a well attended public hearing on January 9k 2007, the Inland-Wetlands Review Area around Mamanasco Lake to 100 feet and by adopting a set of guidelines that are recommended for use throughout the entire watershed.  Any regulated activity that takes place within 100’ of the lake shoreline will require a permit from the Inland Wetlands Board.  While the guidelines are recommendations and not regulations, they may, at the discretion of the Inland Wetlands Board or its designated agents, be required as conditions to obtain a permit for a regulated activity not only within the 100’ review area but the entire watershed as well.

 

The  guidelines are presented in detail on the MLIF website (www.mlif.org). They are consistent with the ongoing efforts of MLIF to protect the quality of the lake.  More information about the plan will be forthcoming.                         

Monthly Meetings:  Come and meet your neighbors and the caregivers of Lake Mamanasco.  The MLIF Board usually* meets once a month, on the first Thursday, in the Community Room at the rear of CVS, next to the Pharmacy, at 8:00 p.m.  You will be updated about what’s going on in the watershed and how the lake is being maintained.  You will also have the opportunity to share your thoughts and concerns about the lake maintenance.  Refreshments are provided.

*Please call Barb Hartman (438-3844) to double-check on the meeting place if you plan to attend as sometimes it is necessary to make a change to the date and/or place of the meeting.

 Suggestions, questions, contributions, etc.:    If you have any a suggestion, question or information that you would like to include in the next newsletter, you can send it to gentlemanjohn@comcast.net or MLIF, P.O. Box 246, Ridgefield, CT 06877.  If you would like to speak to John Wolf directly, you can call him at 438-8500.  

If you have questions regarding the Watercourses Regulations, please call Aimee Pardee, Ridgefield's Wetlands Enforcement Officer at 431-2383.

                                              -------------------------------------------------

 

 

 

 

* * * * * * * * 

 

 

 

Protecting Lake Mamanasco

Since completion of the Lake Mamanasco Watershed study in 1991, the MLIF, in conjunction with and support by both the Town of Ridgefield and the Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection, has initiated the installation of stormwater BMPs and education programs to improve and protect the lake’s water quality. The study points out that the chemical treatments that are currently being used to control weed and algae growth are not a long term solution to that problem.

 

As part of the MLIF planning and educational initiative, in addition to our  watershed management plan, Land-Tech Consultants has prepared, at our request, a Lake Protection Zone document (see below) providing a series of guidelines for the management of lakeside and wetland vegetative filter strips and stormwater runoff management.  Operation and Maintenance Guidance for Low Impact Development Best Management Practices (see below) has also been prepared for use by both residents and the Town’s Highway department. This guidance explains the maintenance requirements of stormwater BMPs already installed to reduce sediment and nutrient loading to the lake, or on private residentially developed land within the watershed.

 

The recent changes to the Inland Wetlands regulations are consistent with the efforts undertaken by the MLIF to adopt flexible guidelines to: 1) direct soil disturbance activities within the Mamanasco Lake watershed, 2) enhance the treatment capacity of vegetative buffers and other Best Management Practices to treat stormwater runoff and other nonpoint sources of pollution, and 3) improve lake water quality, while still permitting reasonable use of property. 

 

We believe that the guidelines in the Lake Protection Zone ordinance are consistent with the new regulations.  

 

 

 

Mamanasco Lake Protection Zone 

 

 

Introduction:

 

In order to reduce the amount of pollution entering Lake Mamanasco by means of storm water runoff, a "Lake Protection Zone" has been delineated within the lake's watershed. The zone will has two regions. Region #1 comprises the shoreline and a shoreline buffer, which  constitutes the area from the shoreline to a distance 100' upland from the lake margin. Region #2 comprises all of the remaining area within the watershed beyond the 100' point.

 

As is currently the case with the four rivers in Town, the Ridgefield Inlands Wetlands Board has amended the Inland-Wetlands regulations by increasing the Upland Review area around Mamanasco Lake to 100 feet and by adopting a set of guidelines that are recommended for the use throughout the entire watershed.  Any regulated activity that takes place within 100' of the lake shoreline will require a permit from the Inlands Wetlands Board.  The guidelines may, at the discretion of the Inland Wetlands Board or its designated agents, be required as condidtions to obtain a permit for a regulated activity not only within the 100' review area but within the entire watershed.  The guidelines are presented below in detail.  They are consistent with the ongoing efforts of MLIF to protect the health of the lake.  Lake systems such as Mamanasco are equally susceptible to land use impacts and are worthy of the same protection as the rivers.

 

Since Region #1 is more densely developed it is the most critical in terms of the impact on the water quality. With the 25’ extended upland review area, all of the land use in Region #1 will be regulated under Section 4.5 of the Town's Inland Wetland and Watercourses regulations. The the guidelines are defined in this document under Lake Protection Guidelines – Region #1. (Note: The use of guidelines has proven to be effective in other towns and, with proper oversight, will be effective in the Town of Ridgefield as well.)

 

Under the proposed changes, land in Region #2 that is within 100’ of a watercourse will also be subject to Inland Wetland regulations. The guidelines are defined in this document under Lake Protection Guidelines – Region #2. 

 

Background and Rational:

Lake Mamanasco has undergone advanced cultural eutrophication, due primarily to stormwater and groundwater inputs from the 537-acre watershed.  A study conducted by Baystate Environmental in 1991, stated the primary source of phosphorus identified was the storm drainage system (50% of the total), with both groundwater (24%) and surface tributaries (16%) contributing substantial amounts of this limiting nutrient to the lake. 

 

A 50% reduction in phosphorus loading from the contributing watershed was recommended in the Baystate findings to improve lake water quality.  In 1996 the Mamanasco Lake Improvement Fund (MLIF) adopted this goal and in association with the Town of Ridgefield and the Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection (CT DEP) implemented a plan to reduce the introduction of sediment and phosphorus by the installation of Best Management Practices (BMPs) on a prioritized basis within the lake’s watershed. 

 

Land-Tech Consultants was retained to develop a watershed management plan for Lake Mamanasco.  The objectives of this project were to assess current watershed conditions, identify nonpoint source pollutants, and the design and development of a stormwater and sediment management plan for the drainage area on the western side of the lake. 

 

A final report entitled Watershed Management Plan for Mamanasco Lake Phase I Report December 29, 1997 identified a prioritized grid system approach to reduce sediment loads and associated phosphorus contributions to the lake. The Mamanasco Lake Improvement Fund adopted the recommendations and Land-Tech Consultants were contracted to begin design of the control measures. Design and construction of Best Management Practices (BMP’s) to reduce nutrient loading from stormwater runoff and sedimentation began in 1998 and 2001, respectively with Grid #1 at Second Lane. Following recommendations from the Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection (CTDEP) design and construction of BMP’s are completed within lower (i.e., Mamanasco Road) and then the upper reaches of individual subsheds (drainage areas) of each grid. The Mamanasco Lake Improvement Fund with grants from the Town of Ridgefield and the CTDEP, Clean Lakes Program, provide funding for design and construction. The Town of Ridgefield Engineering Department contracts for and oversees construction of the drainage improvements. Maintenance of the BMP’s is provided by the Town’s Highway Department.

 

The MLIF recognizes that continued reduction of diffuse nonpoint water contamination requires a watershed-based approach, and that the majority of water quality problems result from nonpoint sources are associated with urbanization of the watershed among other sources. The introduction of pollutants (sediment, nutrients, pesticides, etc.) varies spatially and temporally, making quantification and control difficult.

 

The National Water-Quality Assessment (NAWQA) initiated in 1991 by the U.S. Geological Survey, confirmed that water-quality conditions and aquatic health are reflective of a complex interaction of land-use and management and natural resources (i.e., soils, geology, hydrology and climate). The EPA Storm Water Phase II Rule originates from the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) and applies to communities like Ridgefield, which has adopted a Phase II storm water management plan; also recognizes the importance of controlling non-point source pollution from stormwater runoff. The state of Connecticut also recognizes the importance of managing the introduction nonpoint source pollutants into wetlands and watercourses by the adoption of Inland wetlands and watercourses regulations and 2002 Connecticut Guidelines for Soil Erosion and Sediment Control. The Town of Ridgefield implements both regulatory programs.

 

Recognizing the importance of protecting the lake’s water quality and the results of the Baystate D/F report findings, MLIF proposed adoption of a Lake Protection Zone to further reduce pollutant loading of the lake and expand the introduction of BMPs on both developed and undeveloped parcels as well as within publicly held land.

 

Goals and Objectives:

The following goals and objectives are included in the Lake Protection Zone:

 

Goals:

  1. The control and reduction of sediment and associated nutrients (phosphorus) from watershed runoff;
  2. Maximize, to the extend possible, the infiltration of runoff associated with urbanization of the watershed;
  3. Complement existing land use regulations, while permitting the reasonable use of developed and undeveloped land within the Lake’s watershed, and;
  4. Education of the populous living within the watershed and those who use the lake to the impacts associated with land-development and land use.

Objectives.

  1. Establishment of management zones around the lake with specific guidelines to help direct land development and use;
  2. Introduction of vegetative and structural BMPs to control and treat stormwater runoff on both developed and undeveloped watershed land;
  3. Use of the most current BMP’s to remove, to the maximum extent possible, nonpoint source pollutants when upgrading municipal stormwater management systems or public rights of way;
  4. Control and treat the peak rate of post-development stormwater runoff for a two –year storm to pre-development rates;
  5. Establish a twice per year (fall and spring) cleaning requirement of municipally owned, operated and controlled stormwater management systems, and;
  6. An annual inspection of the watershed by the MLIF in association with the Town of Ridgefield to identify existing or new sources of nonpoint pollution and take measures to control them.

 

PROPOSED GUIDELINES

for the

PROTECTION OF MAMANASCO LAKE

 

Regions of Lake Watershed Protection:

 

Region #1 - Shoreline and Shoreline Protection Area, which includes the lake surface to a point 100.0 ft landward, and;

Region #2 - The remainder of the watershed beyond Region #1

 

Land Development Criteria- Existing and Undeveloped Land

The following guidelines for lake water quality protection are developed from a review of the literature and land use practices employed by other communities.  They include both Regions #1 and #2. Land use guidelines for each area are presented below.  

 

 

LAKE PROTECTION GUIDELINES – Region #1

Shoreline and Shoreline Protection Area

 

Region #1 is the most critical and most developed; therefore, having the greatest potential to impact on lake water quality. The primary objectives within this area on both developed and undeveloped parcels are the creation of a vegetative littoral zone (0 - 3 feet in depth) and upland buffer to filter surface runoff before it enters the lake.  See Figures No. 2 & 3 for a typical site plan examples. To achieve this, the following is proposed.

 

1.      A dock (floating or fixed) and beach area is permitted. The beach area should not exceed 25% of the parcel’s lake frontage.

2.      On undeveloped parcels, a 10.6-meter (35 ft.) wide minimum vegetative buffer component consisting of 50% coarse grasses, wildflowers or other acceptable herbaceous growth and 50% shrubs and trees is proposed.

3.      If a clearing is made for lake access through a vegetative buffer, a path 4-6’ in width made at an angle through the vegetative buffer would decrease the likelihood of runoff. The surface of the path should be porous (i.e., wood chips, stone dust, gravel or other acceptable pervious non-polluting material).

4.      On any existing developed parcel the same 10.6-meter wide buffer is recommended.  When site restrictions preclude this from being achieved, a 4.5-meter (15 ft.) wide minimum upland vegetative buffer component consisting of 50% coarse grasses, wildflowers or other acceptable herbaceous growth and 50% shrubs and trees is recommended.

5.      On existing developed parcels where site conditions preclude the creation of a 4.5-meter wide vegetative upland buffer, one-third or five (5) feet of the buffer may consist of aquatic emergents planted in the shallow littoral (normal high water mark to a 3 foot depth) of the lake.

6.      Clearing of vegetation for a view corridor should be limited to 25% of a parcel’s shoreline length. It is recommended that clear cutting of vegetation on individual lots be limited to a maximum of 25% of the lot area.

7.      Vertical clearing of vegetation should be limited to one-third the height of the tree canopy.

8.      It is recommended that walkways, docks, beaches and boathouse be developed in the view corridor.

9.      It is recommended that landowners employ current Best Management Practices (see attached BMPs) to control sediment and erosion  consistent with the Connecticut guidelines

10.  Control post-development peak rate of stormwater runoff to predevelopment rates for a 2-year storm. Infiltration is the preferred method for control, but other methods may be acceptable. No direct discharges of stormwater runoff to the lake are permitted without pre-treatment to remove 80% of the total suspended solids (TSS) contained in the runoff.

 

LAKE PROTECTION GUIDELINES – Region #2

1.      It is recommended that clear cutting of vegetation on individual lots be limited to a maximum of 25% of the lot area.

2.      It is recommended that clearing of natural vegetation (native species of trees shrubs and herbaceous plants) on individual lots be limited to a maximum of 75% of the lot area. Use of native plant species for landscaping is encouraged.

3.      It is recommended that impervious coverage be kept to a maximum of 8%. Impervious area (i.e., roof, drives, concrete patios) in excess of 8% of the lot area should where practical, be controlled to predevelopment rates for a 2-year storm.  Infiltration is the preferred method for control, but other methods may be acceptable. No direct discharges of stormwater runoff to stormwater systems are permitted without pre-treatment to remove 80% of the TSS. 

4.      An 8-meter (26 ft) wide minimum upland vegetative buffer component consisting of 50% coarse grasses, wildflowers or other acceptable herbaceous growth and 50% shrubs and trees should be provided adjacent to all wetlands and watercourses. Site conditions (e.g., steep slopes) may warrant greater vegetative buffer widths.

 

Additional Recommendations for Entire Watershed – Guidelines

 

Improvements to infrastructure like roadways and drainage systems

  • Employ current BMP’s for upgrading storm water systems consistent with the Connecticut guidelines.
  • Cleaning of catch basins, large particle separators, plunge pools, etc., once per year in Region #2 and twice per year (fall and spring) within Region #1.

Turf Grass Management

  • Testing of topsoil from at least 40% of developed parcels every three to five years to make homeowners aware if excessive fertilization is occurring. The goal is a more judicious use of fertilizer to reduce the amount of nitrogen and phosphorous entering the lake.

Note: Soil samples to be collected from higher priority areas first and sampling staggered, annually from Region #1 then to Region #2. Connecticut Agricultural Station will analyze samples free of charge. 

Septic System Maintenance

  • It is recommended that septic tanks be cleaned by a licensed septic cleaner every three to five years.
  • File report with health department to renew discharge permit.  

Riparian Buffers

·         Develop five (5) meter wide (16.4 feet) riparian buffer at a minimum wherever possible.

 

Entire Watershed

1.                  Subdivisions of two or more lots should comply with current Subdivision regulations for pre and post development peak rates of runoff.

2.                  On-site sewage disposal systems should comply with current State and Town of Ridgefield Health codes.  In situations where existing site limitations preclude meeting the current standards, every effort should be made to comply, including the use of innovative and alternative sewage disposal methodologies approved by the State of Connecticut, Department of Health and Addiction Services.

3.                  Erosion and sediment control plans should be prepared in accordance with current State Guidelines for all land alteration activities regardless of the area of disturbance.

 

Implementation

The Town of Ridgefield Inland Wetlands and Watercourse Agency regulates land use activities within the Town’s inland wetlands and watercourses and the upland review area associated with these resources under Section 4.5 of their regulations. Current Inland wetland regulations provide additional protection of named waterways within the community. Lake systems such as Mamanasco Lake are equally susceptible to land use impacts and are worthy of additional protection. Thus, implementation of these Guidelines is proposed through the Town of Ridgefield Inland Wetlands and Watercourses agency as part of the existing permitting process.

 

* * * * * * *

 

Operation and Maintenance Guidance for Low Impact Development Best Management Practices (BMPs)

 

The following guidance is provided for the operation and maintenance of the Low Impact Development (LID) stormwater Best Management Practices (BMPs).  The guidance is intended for the use of both the residential homeowner and the staff of the municipal department responsible for the maintenance of structures within the public rights of way.

 

This guidance may change from time to time as LID source treatment practices change and operational experience with the systems develops.  This document should then be revised to reflect any changes to these practices.

 

Biofiltration

 

1. “Rain Garden” - Bioretention System

Source treatment of stormwater runoff is accomplished around residential structures by means of infiltration using existing and amended soils.  Plantings of native vegetation within the biofiltration systems maintain the infiltrative capacity of the system, provide soil stabilization, and the attenuation of nutrients and potential nonpoint source pollutants.

Management actions include the following:

  1. Annual inspection and repair of or replacement of treatment components.
  2. Twice per year (spring and fall) inspection of trees and shrubs to evaluate health, removal and replacement of dead or dying plants, pruning of the diseased or broken plants.
  3. Treatment of diseased vegetation with appropriate low-toxicity chemicals (herbicides, pesticides)
  4. Weed annually and prune shrub vegetation until vegetation is established to improve appearance. Generally two to three years (growing seasons).
  5. Replace mulch to cover exposed soil area with removal and replacement of mulch every two to three years. Mulch depth not to exceed three (3) inches.  Use single pass large much.  
  6. Sample soil for fertility every three years.  Addition of limestone one or two times per year to maintain proper pH is recommended.  Field or laboratory testing for pH is acceptable.

 

2a. Grassed Lined Swales

Grassed lined swales provide transmission of post-development runoff as well as filtration and infiltration of stormwater runoff.  The turf environment also removes nutrients and other pollutants from runoff via physical filtration and nutrient attenuation prior to discharge.

Management actions include the following measures:

  1. Cut grass weekly or as needed to a height of 2.5-3 inches.  Leave clippings in place to provide fertilizer for new growth.
  2. Reseed swale with appropriate grass seed mixture and application rates as needed to insure that no bare spots develop.
  3. Sample soil for fertility every three years. Addition of limestone one or two times per year to maintain proper pH is recommended. Field or laboratory testing for pH is acceptable.
  4. Inspect turf grass for insect and weed infestation and evidence of disease and apply appropriate Integrated Pest Management (IPM) control measures for control.
  5. Inspect swale regularly for evidence of rill development.  Pack rills with sandy till, compact and apply 4-6” of settled top soil, reseed with turf mix, mulch and water as needed until grass is established (70% coverage)

 

2b. Grassed Lined Swale /Infiltration Level Spreader

The grassed lined swale/infiltration level spreader is designed to accept pre-treated runoff from impervious surfaces associated with development.  Runoff is infiltrated into the ground with excess flows discharged via overland sheet flow.  The turf environment also removes nutrients and other pollutants from runoff via physical filtration and nutrient attenuation prior to discharge.

Management actions include the following measures:

  1. Inspect the surface of the trench surface regularly (monthly) to insure surface is free of debris and the discharge is flowing via sheet flow and not concentrated.
  2. Inspect the discharge lip area for low points and down gradient flow areas for active scour or soil erosion.  Repair scour and rills with compacted sandy till, reseed, if turf grass and mulch.
  3. Inspect turf area down gradient of swale regularly for evidence of rill development.  Pack rills with sandy till, compact and apply 4-6” of settled top soil, reseed with turf mix, mulch and water, as needed, until grass is established (70% coverage).  If forest litter, re-apply four (4) inches of composted leaf mold and apply erosion control blanket (netting) in accordance with manufactures directions as needed to prevent scouring.
  4. Cut grass weekly or as needed to a height of 2.5-3 inches.  Leave clippings in place to provide fertilizer for new growth.
  5. Inspect swale twice per year (early spring and late fall), evaluate sediment depth and or accumulation of organic debris (leaves, etc).  Removed leaves to prevent matting of grass and dispose of properly. Remove accumulated sediment by hand, when depth of sediment is greater then 4” (1/3 depth of swale).  Dispose of sediment off site in approved upland area.
  6. Reseed swale with appropriate grass seed mixture and application rates, as needed, to insure that no bare spots develop.
  7. Sample soil for fertility every three years. Addition of limestone one or two times per year to maintain proper pH is recommended.  Field or laboratory testing for pH is acceptable. Apply organic slow release fertilizer based on results of fertility tests.
  8. Inspect turf grass for insect and weed infestation and evidence of disease and apply appropriate Integrated Pest Management (IPM) control measures for control, as needed.

 

3. Stormwater Wetland

The treatment wetland is designed to accept stormwater runoff from impervious surfaces.  The system is created with an inlet forebay (3 - 4 feet deep) and shallow (6-18” deep) outlet pool to trap sediment and provide habitat for aquatic organisms.  A shallow pond and wet meadow environment in the floor of the wetland is intended to provide biological and physical filtration of runoff prior to discharge.  Some runoff storage capacity for flood flows is also provided in the system by means of a control outlet structure.  The basin is planted with sedges, rushes and grasses as well as woody shrubs to provide soil stabilization, filtration and wildlife habitat.

Management actions include the following measures:

1.      Annual inspection of the forebay and inlet/outlet structure and removal of accumulated sediment when sediment depth in the forebay reaches 50% (1.5 – 2.0 feet) of the depth of the forebay.  Frequency of cleaning varies from 3-7 years depending on loading rate.

2.      Replacement of any diseased or dead vegetation within the basin with native species, as per the approved plan and by the EPB;

3.      Removal of any invasive plants, as identified by the current listing of Invasive Species compiled by the State Arboretum.  These shall include, but not be limited to, purple loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria), common reed (Phragmites australis), multiflora rose (Rosa multiflora).).  Removal shall be by hand, shovel or pulling, treatment of cut stump within 20 minutes of cutting or spraying of foliage with a 1-2% solution of Rodeoä;

4.      Inspection of the outlet pool and outlet structure and removal of sediment when sediment depth reaches 50% of the depth of the pool;

5.      Inspection and clearing of debris from the basin floor, inlet and outlet structures every six-months;

6.      Inspection of the basin to insure sheet and baseline stream flow through the wetland;

7.      Repairs to any obvious soil erosion of the sidewalls or floor of the basin, and;

8.      Repairs to the inlet and outlet structures, as needed.

 

 

4. Infiltration Level Spreader

The infiltration level spreader is designed to accept pre-treated runoff from impervious surfaces associated with dwelling development.  Runoff is infiltrated into the ground and flows via overland sheet flow toward the pond

Management actions include the following measures:

  1. Inspect the surface of the trench surface regularly (monthly) to insure surface is free of debris and the discharge is flowing via sheet flow and not concentrated.
  2. Inspect the discharge lip area for low points and down gradient flow areas for active scour or soil erosion.  Repair scour and rills with compacted sandy till, reseed, if turf grass and mulch. If forest litter, re-apply four (4) inches of composted leaf mold and apply erosion control blanket (netting) in accordance with manufactures directions as needed to prevent scouring.

 

5. Stone Trench Drains

Trench drains are provided at the rear of residential dwellings to collect surface flows and roof runoff and infiltrate the runoff into the surrounding soil matrix.  Excess runoff not infiltrated into the soil is transferred to the stormwater collection system for pre-treatment prior to discharge.

Management actions include the following measures:

  1. Inspect the surface of the trench surface regularly (monthly) to insure surface is free of debris and accepting surface runoff.
  2. Areas of ponded water over the stone inlets indicate blockage in the stone or collection pipe. Excavate stone and expose collection pipe to determine reason for blockage. Snake pipe or replace stone as needed.
  3. Check points of discharge into the stormwater piping system to insure free flow of discharge from collection pipe.  Clean or repair as required to re-establish proper flow.

6. Vegetative Filter Strip

The vegetative filter strip is designed to accept stormwater runoff from the grass lined level spreader, roof runoff and sheet flow.  The system is created to restore historically impacted riparian/wetland environments, trap sediment, infiltrate runoff, provide wildlife habitat and provide a natural floral transition from upland to wetland.  The system is planted with herbaceous plants and shrubs to provide for long-term soil stabilization, seasonal nutrient uptake by plants and maintain the soil’s infiltration capacity.

Management actions include the following measures:

1.      For the first three growing seasons inspect the system twice per year (late spring and early fall).  Replace any diseased or dead vegetation within the system with native species, as per the approved plan and by the Municipal Inland wetland and watercourses agency;

2.      Long-term, removal any invasive plants, as identified by the current listing of Invasive Species compiled by the State Arboretum.  These shall include, but not be limited to, purple loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria), common reed (Phragmites australis), multiflora rose (Rosa multiflora).).  Removal shall be by hand, shovel or pulling, treatment of cut stump within 20 minutes of cutting or spraying of foliage with a 1-2% solution of Rodeoä;

3.      Repair any obvious soil erosion (i.e., rills, gullies) Pack rills with sandy till, compact and apply 4-6” of settled top soil, reseed with turf mix, mulch and water, as needed, until grass is established (70% coverage).  If forest litter, re-apply four (4) inches of composted leaf mold and apply erosion control blanket (netting) in accordance with manufactures directions as needed to prevent scouring.

4.      Only organic slow release fertilizers shall be applied based on the results of soil fertility tests.

 

Stormwater Structures

1. Catch Basins with Deep Sumps and Hooded Outlet

Catch basins with four (4) foot deep sumps and outlet baffles are intended to collect stormwater runoff from the driveways, streets, parking areas and provide partial sediment removal and collection of floatables with discharge of flows to treatment other BMPs before discharging.

Management actions include the following measures:

1.      Inspect basins twice per year and remove accumulated sediment and debris from the basin with a vacuum truck.  Clean basin when sediment levels reach 24 inches in depth within the sumps.

2.      Inspect the outlet baffles (snouts) to insure proper attachment to wall of basin, repair as need in conformance with manufactures installation instructions.

3.      Check inlet and outlet pipes for blockages and clean and repair, as needed.

4.      Clean inlet grates of leaves each fall to permit proper flow into basins and minimize the amount of leaf litter entering the system.

 

2. Large Particle Separators (hydrodynamic separator)

Large particle separators (LPSs) are provided to remove suspended sediment, floatable debris and other solids and adsorbed pollutants from the stormwater stream draining from travel surfaces (roads, drives, parking areas).

Management actions include the following measures:

  1. Inspect structures quarterly for the first three years of operation initially to determine the accumulation rate of sediment and debris within the structures.
  2. Based on accretion rates, establish an inspection and cleaning schedule for the LPSs.
  3. Maintain the structures in accordance with the manufactures guidelines.

3. Drop-Inlet Structures

Drop-inlet structures are intended to create shallow pools to pond water, entrap water borne sediment, reduce the erosion of stream beds and banks, and provide a stable transition in stream elevations.  The structure incorporates the use of both structural (stone) and biotechnical (engineering fabric, vegetation) soil stabilization measures.

 

Management actions include the following actions:

 

  1. Inspect pools behind the stone drop structure twice per year for the first three years of operation initially to determine the accumulation rate of sediment and debris within the structures. Based on accretion rates, establish an inspection and cleaning schedule for the pools.  
  2. Remove accumulated sediment and debris with a vacuum truck or with hand labor.  Clean basin when sediment levels reach 50% of the pool depth.
  3. Inspect the outlet structure during cleaning for breaches and damage, and repair as needed to maintain flow in the center of the structure.
  4. Inspect the stream bed down gradient of the structure for evidence of scour, and re-armor as needed to prevent further scouring.
  5.  Inspect the vegetation along the banks and re-seed or replace dead and diseased to prevent soil erosion and long-term stability.

 

Disposal of Sediment and Debris

Disposal of debris and sediment removed from any of the structures must be in accordance with all applicable local, state and federal regulations.  On-site disposal of sediment and debris is not recommended.

END

  

 

  

 

 

 

Return to Home